See Free Picks [above] for additional comments that may apply
to Pay Services.
All wagers in monitored areas are fixed at 100 credits. Each play is
equally weighted as ONE unit.
The dollars won/lost figures
are the result of equally weighting plays as ONE unit. A service's Win
Rate is the number of net games won per 100 plays, equally weighted at ONE
unit/$100 per play.
To demonstrate a money management program,
Pay Services are allowed to "rate" their selections.
This provides each service with the opportunity to
demonstrate the money management aspects of their service through
the weighting of their selections.
A complete breakdown of rated results appear on their individual
ratings page.
An example of how BigGuy displays results for pay
services can be viewed
here.
The rating assigned appears with each play.
Each service is allowed to use their own rating system.
Consequently, a uniform rating system does not exist.
Thus, multiplying out ratings becomes individualistic and ineffective for
comparison purposes.
An example here would be a service who uses 3, 4, 5 for ratings and
another who uses 30, 40, 50. If both services had identical records,
one would have a profit or loss 10 times the other, simply because the
ratings that were used were 10 times as much.
Some form of mapping each individual rating system into a uniform
rating system would be required to compare rated outcomes between
services and may be visited at a later time.
Our contention is that this step may not be necessary.
Users are given sufficient information to determine each service's
ability to perform on their higher rated plays, regardless of the
numeric rating actually assigned to them.
Pay selections cannot be seen before game times, but
do become viewable to the public 5 minutes after the scheduled
start time of any event on which the service has a play.
Displaying plays shortly after post time and well before completion,
helps to minimize any speculation surrounding the monitoring process,
while furthering the integrity of the documented results found at BigGuy.
A single uniform grading line is used to grade all handicappers in both
monitored areas, Free Picks and Pay Services.
Services are encouraged to read a detailed discussion of how this line is
determined - Line Policy.
Monitored pay services are allowed to submit any reasonable conditions
and line limits on their plays.
These include limits/paramaters on pointspreads to qualify/disqualify a
play and listing pitchers in MLB. These limits must also be passed on
to a service's clients as well.
For example, plays may be submitted as follows:
NFL
Denver (no higher than -7.0)
Over New Orleans (no higher than 36.5)
MLB
NY Yankees (listing Clemens) vs
Atlanta (listing Maddux or Glavine)
BigGuy is collectively owned and operated by two previously
independent internet monitoring services, The Arena (David Arico)
and Sportpix (Donald Hepworth).
This site has been used to monitor services and websites since the
beginning of the MLB season on March 31, 1998 and the start
of the NBA and NHL playoffs 1998 on April 19.
In contrast to the Simulation,
the pay services you find listed at this site have been required to
disclose
some additional information so that a good faith effort can be made to
ascertain the
legitimacy and owner of each service.
You may view the Pay Service
application to get an idea of what information
is requested of a pay service when they apply.
In monitoring, it is important to remain as objective as possible.
Aside from reporting their results,
we do not endorse or promote any particular service.
We do not vouch for the integrity, honesty, or legitimacy of any listed
service.
Reputations along these lines are earned over time through the results
a service produces and the extent of customer service they provide.
If you are not familiar with a service, we can help you with answers
concerning:
1) their documented record/results,
2) whether they are posting records/making claims consistent with our
documentation, and
3) if we are aware of, or have received complaints regarding that
service.
From a consumer protection standpoint, we do step in and
volunteer opinions on matters where we feel a service is misrepresenting
or reporting results that are not in line with their documented record.